Evaluation of Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing from Direct Blood Cultures
Main Article Content
Abstract
Backgrounds: Bacterial sepsisis the major cause of death among hospitalized patients. Rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis of bloodstream infections is important for patient management.
Objectives: To evaluatedthe efficiency of identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from direct blood culturescompared to standard methods using VITEK®2 compact automation atSurinHospital.
Methods: In this study, only positive samples from culture bottles of total 98 blood samples from patients admitted at Surin Hospital were selected to further evaluate. Each selected blood sample was prepared by centrifugation for direct pellet collection and comparison with the corresponding standard bacterial culture for. The results were analyzed with VITEK® 2 compact for identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing.
Results: The bacterial identification test by direct blood culturecompared with the standard method revealed that 66 samples were Gram-negative bacteria.The sensitivityand 95%CI were 95.5% and 87.3-99.1% respectively. While32 samples were Gram-positive bacteria. The sensitivity and 95%CI were 84.4% and 67.2-94.7%,respectively. The antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed. The Essential agreement (EA) and Categorical agreement (CA) were 98% and 96.5%, respectively, with an error of 3.5% for Gram-negative bacteria. EA and CA of Gram-positive bacteria were 94% with an error rate of 5.6% comparing to the standard method. Theduration time required for identification and susceptibility testing from using direct blood culture was 10-16 hours and the standard method was 34-40 hours. The results found that using direct blood culture spent significant shorter time comparing to that using standard method (p< 0.0001).
Conclusions: The identification and antimicrobial susceptibility test of bacteria from direct blood culture weremore effective and higher sensitivityfor Gram-negative bacteria diagnosis. This method has a reduced sample preparation-to-report time of 10-24hours comparing to the standard method. As a result, doctors are able to diagnose bloodstream infections and provide appropriate treatment for patients more quickly, as well as decrease in patient mortality.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
คณะกรรมการพัฒนาระบบบริการสุขภาพ (Service Plan) สาขาอายุรกรรม. คู่มือสำหรับประชาชน "รู้เท่าทัน เซ็พสิส ป้องกัน รู้ทัน รักษาไว". นนทบุรี : กองบริหารการสาธารณสุข กระทรวงสาธารณสุข; 2562.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Principles and Procedures for Blood Culture: Approved Guideline. Pennsylvania: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2007.
สุวรรณา ตระกูลสมบูรณ์, วิภา ตรีรัตน์วีรพงษ์, ฉันทนา อรัญญะ. การเพาะเชื้อจากเลือด. ใน: มาลัย วรจิตร, วันทนา ปวีณกิตติพร, สุวรรณา ตระกูลสมบูรณ์, สุรางค์ เดชศิริเลิศ, บรรณาธิการ. คู่มือปฏิบัติงานแบคทีเรียและรา สำหรับโรงพยาบาลศูนย์และโรงพยาบาลทั่วไป 2561. นนทบุรี : กรมวิทยาศาสตร์การแพทย์ กระทรวงสาธารณสุข; 2561: 54-60.
Munson EL, Diekema DJ, Beekmann SE, Chapin KC, Doern GV. Detection and treatment of bloodstream infection: laboratory reporting and antimicrobial management. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41(1):495-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.495-497.2003.
Rizoli SB, Marshall JC. Saturday night fever: finding and controlling the source of sepsis in critical illness. Lancet Infect Dis 2002;2(3):137-44. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00220-7.
Bazzi AM, Rabaan AA, Fawarah MM, Al-Tawfiq JA. Direct identification and susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures using high speed cold centrifugation and Vitek II system. J Infect Public Health 2017;10(3):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2016.05.012.
de Cueto M, Ceballos E, Martinez-Martinez L, Perea EJ, Pascual A. Use of positive blood cultures for direct identification and susceptibility testing with the vitek 2 system. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42(8):3734-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3734-3738.2004.
Fontanals D, Salceda F, Hernández J, Sanfeliu I, Torra M. Evaluation of wider system for direct identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from positive blood culture bottles. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;21(9):693-5. doi: 10.1007/s10096-002-0791-4.
Gherardi G, Angeletti S, Panitti M, Pompilio A, Di Bonaventura G, Crea F, et al. Comparative evaluation of the Vitek-2 Compact and Phoenix systems for rapid identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing directly from blood cultures of Gram-negative and Gram-positive isolates. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2012;72(1):20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.09.015.
Hansen DS, Jensen AG, Nørskov-Lauritsen N, Skov R, Bruun B. Direct identification and susceptibility testing of enteric bacilli from positive blood cultures using VITEK (GNI+/GNS-GA). Clin Microbiol Infect 2002;8(1):38-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2002.00372.x.
Machen A, Drake T, Wang YF. Same day identification and full panel antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from positive blood culture bottles made possible by a combined lysis-filtration method with MALDI-TOF VITEK mass spectrometry and the VITEK2 system. PLoS One 2014;9(2):e87870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087870.
Ibrahim EH, Sherman G, Ward S, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH. The influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infections on patient outcomes in the ICU setting. Chest 2000;118(1):146-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.1.146.
bioMérieux SA . Vitek 2TMProduct Information. North Carolina: bioMérieux, Inc.; 2016.
Clark RB, Lewinski MA, Loeffelholz MJ, Tibbetts RJ. 31A Verification and Validation of Procedures in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory. 1st.ed. Washington, DC : ASM Press; 2009.
Humphries RM, Ambler J, Mitchell SL, Castanheira M, Dingle T, Hindler JA, et al. CLSI Methods Development and Standardization Working Group Best Practices for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests. J Clin Microbiol 2018;56(4):e01934-17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01934-17.
Nimer NA, Al-Saa'da RJ, Abuelaish O. Accuracy of the VITEK® 2 system for a rapid and direct identification and susceptibility testing of Gramnegative rods and Gram-positive cocci in blood samples. East Mediterr Health J 2016;22(3):193-200. doi: 10.26719/2016.22.3.193.
Kong H, Zhang S, Chen X, Zhang W, Yang Q, Fu Y, et al. Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from blood cultures of gram-negative and gram-positive isolates. Clin Lab 2013;59(11-12):1305-10. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2013.121132.
Chen JR, Lee SY, Yang BH, Lu JJ. Rapid identification and susceptibility testing using the VITEK 2 system using culture fluids from positive BacT/ALERT blood cultures. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2008;41(3):259-64.
Ling TK, Liu ZK, Cheng AF. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41(10):4705-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4705-4707.2003.
Lupetti A, Barnini S, Castagna B, Capria AL, Nibbering PH. Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling of Gram-positive cocci in blood cultures with the Vitek 2 system. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2010;29(1):89-95. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0825-2
Waites KB, Brookings ES, Moser SA, Zimmer BL. Direct bacterial identification from positive BacT/Alert blood cultures using MicroScan overnight and rapid panels. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1998;32(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(98)00058-3.
Waites KB, Brookings ES, Moser SA, Zimmer BL. Direct susceptibility testing with positive BacT/Alert blood cultures by using MicroScan overnight and rapid panels. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36(7):2052-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.7.2052-2056.1998.
Prod'hom G, Durussel C, Greub G. A simple blood-culture bacterial pellet preparation for faster accurate direct bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing with the VITEK 2 system. J Med Microbiol 2013;62(Pt 5):773-7. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.049361-0.
Barry J, Brown A, Ensor V, Lakhani U, Petts D, Warren C, et al. Comparative evaluation of the VITEK 2 Advanced Expert System (AES) in five UK hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;51(5):1191-202. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg234.
Barenfanger J, Drake C, Kacich G. Clinical and financial benefits of rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbio . 1999;37(5):1415-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.5.1415-1418.1999.