Study of the Anterolateral Mini-invasive Approach Versus Standard Posterior Approach for Primary Total Hip Replacement Early Results

Main Article Content

Damrongtham Olarachin

Abstract

Back ground: The interest in minimally invasive approach for total hip replacement (THR) ; we carried out a comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive in comparison with standard posterior approach. The early clinical results are excellent and rapid ambulation
Objective: To compare clinical result between anterolateral minimal invasive and standard posterior approach
Research design: Retrospective observational study
Setting: Department of Orthopaedic, Surin Hospital
Material and Method: Between January 2006-January 2008 in Surin Hospital. A prospective of THR 10 patients by ALMI approach was compared retrospectively with THR 15 patients underwent standard posterior approach. Inclusion criteria was primary THR with a principle diagnosis of osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis biological, radiological and clinical data were collected and analyzed by Mann-Whitney UTest.
Result: There was significantly difference in duration of operation time, length the wound, and length of hospitalization (days) in the ALMI groups compared with the standard posterior group (p<0.05), There was no statistical difference in age, Hct preoperative and postoperative, blood loss, modified harris hip score and abduction angle of acetabulum
Discussion: Minimally invasive approach of total hip replacement by anterolateral mini¬mal invasive approach had good clinical result
Key words: Anterolateral minimal invasive approach, Standard posterior approach modified harris hip score

Article Details

How to Cite
Olarachin, D. (2018). Study of the Anterolateral Mini-invasive Approach Versus Standard Posterior Approach for Primary Total Hip Replacement Early Results. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF SISAKET SURIN BURIRAM HOSPITALS, 24(1), 271–277. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MJSSBH/article/view/147156
Section
Original Articles

References

1. อารี ตนาวลี และคนอื่นๆ. ตำราศัลยศาสตร์ ข้อสะโพกและข้อเข่าเทียม. กรุงเทพฯ : กรุงเทพเวชสาร; 2547.

2. de Beer J. Petruccelli D, Zalzal P, Winemaker MJ. Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty ; length doesn’t matter. J Arthroplasty 2004;19(8):945-50.

3. Fehring TK, Mason JB. Catastrophic complications of minimally invasive hip surgery. A series of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(4):711-4.

4. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(11):2432-8.

5. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, OBrien S, Beverland D. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(4):701-10.

6. Pierchon F, Migaud H, Duquennoy A, Fontaine C. Evaluation radiologique du centre de rotation de la hanche. Rev Chir Orthop 79:281-4.

7. Chimemto GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N, Kahn B, Cahill J, Sculco TP. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty : a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:139-44.

8. DiGioia AM. Plakseychuk Ay, Levison TJ, Jaramaz B. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty : length dosen’s matter. J Arthroplasty 2003;19:945-50.

9. Musil D, Stehlik J, Verner M. A comparison of operative invasiveness in minimally invasive anterolateral hp replacement (MIS-AL) and standard hp procedure, using biochemical markers. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2008;75:16-20.

10. Cameron HU. Mini-incisions : visualization is key. Orthopedics 2002;25:473.

11. Callaghan J. Skeptical perspectives on minimally invasive total hip arthroplasy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;85:2242-3.

12. Chimento G, Povone V, Sharrock N, Kahn B, Cahill J, Sculco. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2005:20:139-44.

13. Teet JS, Skinner HB, Khoury L. The effect of the “mini” incision in total hip arthroplasty on component position. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:503-7.

14. Jerosch J, Theising C, Fadel ME. Anterolateral minimal invasive (ALMI) approach for total hip arthroplasty technique and early results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006;126(3):164-73.

15. Chiron P, Laffosse J, Febie F, Puget J, Voie de’abord posterieure pour prothese totale de hanche In J. Puget Proghese totale de hanche. Les choix. Paris : Elsevier; 2005:269-83.

16. Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:1295.

17. Bertin KC, Rottinnger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery : a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Brthop 429:248-55.

18. Pellicci PM, Bostrom M, Poss R. Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop 1998;55:224-8.