Tubeles Spercutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Post-operative Complication Comparison Between Stent and Stentless in Tubeless PCNL

Main Article Content

Pramote Saeoueng

Abstract

Background: Kidney stones are a common problem in the Northeast of Thailand. eventually leading to urinary tract infections and kidney failure. The main treatment for large kidney stones is PCNL. A DJ stent (Tubeless PCNL) is commonly used to drain urine to prevent obstruction after surgery. This study compared safety in patients undergoing surgery without a DJ stent after surgery (stentless in tubeless PCNL).
Objective: To compare the complications of PCNL surgery between DJ stent insertion after surgery and no DJ stent insertion.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent PCNL surgery from July 2012-May 2020 at Sisaket Hospital. All surgeries were performed the same way as Standard PCNL, prone position and pneumatic lithotripsy.This study was comparison between two groups, tubeless PCNL and stentless in tubeless PCNL. Exclusion criteria are those at risk of infection or renal failure, have a high residual stone, or have an endopyelotomy. The study will look at postoperative conditions such as length of stay in hospital, blood transfusion, fever from infection, postoperative hemorrhage, pleuraleffusion, and stone migration.
Results: Two hundred and eightpatients underwent stentless in tubeless PCNL, or 43.9%, were in the range of age between 24-82 years. When comparing complications of PCNL, there was no difference between a DJ stent and without a DJ stent. Whether it was hospital stay (p-value = 0.183), fever from infection after surgery (p-value=0.082),blood transfusion (p-value=0.528),postoperative bleeding (p-value=0.638), pleural effusion (p-value=0.69), and stone migration (p-value=0.056).
Conclusion: Stentless in tubeless PCNL surgery complications would not different from tubeless PCNL. It could also reduce problems caused by DJ stent, such as pain from DJ stent, hematuria, stone encrusted, and the most worrying thing is that patients do not come to remove the DJ stent, which will lead to more complications.
Keywords: Tubeless PCNL, stentless PCNL, Renal stone, Complications

Article Details

How to Cite
Saeoueng, P. . (2021). Tubeles Spercutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Post-operative Complication Comparison Between Stent and Stentless in Tubeless PCNL. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF SISAKET SURIN BURIRAM HOSPITALS, 36(2), 367–373. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MJSSBH/article/view/252857
Section
Original Articles

References

Yanagawa M, Kawamura J, Onishi T, Soga N, Kameda K, Sriboonlue P, et al. Incidence of urolithiasis in northeast Thailand. Int J Urol 1997;4(6):537-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.1997.tb00304.x.

Shah HN, Kausik VB, Hegde SS, Shah JN, Bansal MB. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective feasibility study and review of previous reports. BJU Int 2005;96(6):879-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05730.x.

Bhuiyan NI, Islam MF, Khan SA, Bhuiyan ZH, Towhid KMH, Ahmed NIU, et al. Tubeless & Stentless PCNL in Selected Cases Our Experience in Bangladesh. JSS 2012;16(1):18-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.3329/jss.v16i1.14443

Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, Gerspach J, Kurtz S, Stout L. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Uro. 1997;157(5):1578-82. PMID: 9112480

Candela J, Davidoff R, Gerspach J, Bellman GC. "Tubeless" percutaneous surgery: a new advance in the technique of percutaneous renal surgery. Tech Urol 1997;3(1):6-11. PMID: 9170218

Nawaz H, Hussain M, Hashmi A, Hussain Z, Zafar N, Naqvi A, et al. Experience with indwelling "J.J" ureteral stents. J Pak Med Assoc 1993;43(8):147-9. PMID: 8264090

el-Faqih SR, Shamsuddin AB, Chakrabarti A, Atassi R, Kardar AH, Osman MK, et al. Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol 1991;146(6):1487-91. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38146-6.

Patil S., Raghuvanshi K., Jain DK, Raval A. Forgotten ureteral double-J stents and related complications: a real-world experience. Afr J Urol 2020;26(8):1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-020-0020-3

Miyaoka R, Monga M. Ureteral stent discomfort: Etiology and management. Indian J Urol 2009;25(4):455-60. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.57910.

Shah HN, Kausik VB, Hegde SS, Shah JN, Bansal MB. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective feasibility study and review of previous reports. BJU Int 2005;96(6):879-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05730.x.

Moosanejad N, Firouzian A, Hashemi SA, Bahari M, Fazli M. Comparison of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a randomized, clinical trial. Braz J Med Biol Res 2016;49(4):e4878. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20154878.

Ray RP, Mahapatra RS, Mondal PP, Pal DK. Long-term complications of JJ stent and its management: A 5 years review. Urol Ann 2015;7(1):41-5. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.148599.

Lawrentschuk N, Russell JM. Ureteric stenting 25 years on: routine or risky?. ANZ J Surg 2004;74(4):243-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2004.02947.x.

Aghamir SM, Hosseini SR, Gooran S. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2004;18(7):647-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.647.

ธาตรี วีรัศวิน. ประสิทธิผลของการผ่าตัดนิ่วในไตโดยการเจาะรูผ่านผิวหนังและไม่ใส่ท่อระบายไต. ลำปางเวชสาร 2552;30(3):115-21.