Efficacy of Twice Daily Human Premixed Insulin Versus Bedtime NPH in Insulin Naïve T2 DM Patients

Main Article Content

Suwanna Pitchaiprasert

Abstract

Background: Management of T2DM consist of life style modification and pharmacologic treatment (oral antidiabetic agent and injectable agent). From the recent data Most of Thai diabetes patients failed to achieve good glycemic control despite they already received optimum dose of oral antidiabetic agents. As well as the new diabetes patients who had very high plasma glucose at diagnosis tend to had poor glycemic control and lead to diabetic related complications.
Objective: This study aim to compare the efficacy and safety of human premixed insulin twice daily with bedtime NPH in insulin naïve T2DM patients at Surin hospital
Methods: A, retrospective cohort design therapeutic research was conducted in Surin Hospital, Surin province, Thailand.T2DM patients who received premixed insulin and NPH as the 1st insulin regimen between April 2020 to September 2020 were selected. Patient’s characteristic and glycemic data at time of insulin initiation and at 6 months after treatment were reviewed. To compare the change of HbA1c, number of patients with HbA1c<7%, Number of admission or OPD visit with hypoglycemia. Chi-squared test, t-test, exact probability test and multivariable Gaussian regression were used to evaluate the outcome
Results: total 524 patients,209 patients were prescribed premixed insulin and 315 patients were prescribed NPH. After multivariable Gaussian regression analysis, patients in premixed insulin group achieved the significant higher reduction of HbA1c level than NPH group 5.9%, but no significant difference in the percent of patients with HbA1c <7% . On the other hand premixed insulin group had significant higher number of admission or OPD visit with hypoglycemia than NPH group 1.1 times.
Conclusion: Human premixed insulin twice daily regimen attains the higher reduction of HbA1c level than bedtime NPH regimen. However, this regimen occurs the higher hypoglycemic event.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pitchaiprasert, S. . (2022). Efficacy of Twice Daily Human Premixed Insulin Versus Bedtime NPH in Insulin Naïve T2 DM Patients. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF SISAKET SURIN BURIRAM HOSPITALS, 37(2), 363–372. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MJSSBH/article/view/256725
Section
Original Articles

References

คลังข้อมูลสุขภาพ กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. ร้อยละผู้ป่วยโรคเบาหวานที่ควบคุมระดับน้ำตาลได้ดีปีงบประมาณ 2563 [อินเตอร์เน็ท]. [สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 เมษายน 2565]. ค้นได้จาก:URL: https://hdcservice.moph.go.th/hdc/reports/report_kpi.php?flag_kpi_level=9&flag_kpi_year=2020&source=pformated/format1.php&id=137a726340e4dfde7bbbc5d8aeee3ac3#.

Gregg EW, Sattar N, Ali MK. The changing face of diabetes complications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016;4(6):537-47. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30010-9.

Harding JL, Pavkov ME, Magliano DJ, Shaw JE, Gregg EW. Global trends in diabetes complications: a review of current evidence. Diabetologia 2019;62(1):3-16. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4711-2.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, Draznin B, Aroda VR, Bakris G, Benson G, Brown FM, et al. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care 2022;45(Suppl 1):S125-S43. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S009.

สมาคมโรคเบาหวานแห่งประเทศไทย ในพระบรมราชูปถัมภ์สมเด็จพระเทพรัตนราชสุดาฯ สยามบรมราชกุมารี. แนวทางเวชปฏิบัติสำหรับโรคเบาหวาน พ.ศ. 2560. [อินเตอร์เน็ท]. [สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 เมษายน 2565]. ค้นได้จาก:URL: https://www.dmthai.org/index.php/knowledge/healthcare-providers/cpg/443-guideline-diabetes-care-2017

สมาคมโรคเบาหวานแห่งประเทศไทย. แนวทางเวชปฏิบัติ เรื่อง การให้ยาเพื่อควบคุมระดับน้ำตาลในเลือดในผู้ใหญ่ (ปรับปรุง). [Internet]. [สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 เมษายน 2565]. ค้นได้จาก:URL:https://www.dmthai.org/index.php/knowledge/healthcare-providers/cpg/1036-cpg-2020-01.

Rawdaree P, Sarinnapakorn V, Pattanaungkul S, Khovidhunkit W, Tannirandorn P, Peerapatdit T. A prospective, longitudinal, multicenter, observational study to assess insulin treatment patterns in diabetic patients in Thailand: results from the TITAN study. J Med Assoc Thai 2014;97:1140-50.

Rys P, Wojciechowski P, Rogoz-Sitek A, Niesyczyński G, Lis J, Syta A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing efficacy and safety outcomes of insulin glargine with NPH insulin, premixed insulin preparations or with insulin detemir in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol 2015;52(4):649-62. doi: 10.1007/s00592-014-0698-4.

Eliasson B, Ekström N, Bruce Wirta S, Odén A, Fard MP, Svensson AM. Metabolic effects of Basal or premixed insulin treatment in 5077 insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes patients: registry-based observational study in clinical practice. Diabetes Ther 2014;5(1):243-54. doi: 10.1007/s13300-014-0068-9.

Freemantle N, Chou E, Frois C, Zhuo D, Lehmacher W, Vlajnic A, et al. Safety and efficacy of insulin glargine 300 u/mL compared with other basal insulin therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a network meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2016;6(2):e009421. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009421.

Hirsch IB. Insulin analogues. N Engl J Med 2005;352(2):174-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra040832.

Porcellati F, Lucidi P, Cioli P, Candeloro P, Marinelli Andreoli A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin glargine given in the evening as compared with in the morning in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015;38(3):503-12. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0649.

Wang Z, Hedrington MS, Gogitidze Joy N, Briscoe VJ, Richardson MA, Younk L, et al. Dose-response effects of insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010;33(7):1555-60. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2011.